Studies in EnglishContact information: Department office: Unioninkatu 37 (P.O. Box 54) 00014 University of Helsinki phone +358-(0)9-191 24850 fax +358-(0)9-191 24849 |
Courses in English, Spring Term 2007-2008
Workshop on qualitative methods in Communication Science:
Interviews as a means of discovering motives and self images of commentary posters, 5 credits ! This course can be registered under the study unit S14 (course code 770047). Master students of the Department of Communication need to negotiate with lecturer Ritva Levo-Henriksson if they want to register this course as a part of S15 (course code 770048). Preregistration in Weboodi is required! 20 students will be accepted to the course in the order of registration. Course Description: Methods of empirical social research can be differentiated in quantitative and qualitative approaches. While quantitative oriented research aims to transfer “observed reality” into numerical data to make it accessible for statistical computation, the qualitative approaches try to interprete and describe a complexe phenomenon in its complete spectrum. Furthermore, qualitative methods are often used in cases of relatively unknown research fields to explore and generate hypotheses. There is a relatively new phenomenon of big online newspapers providing a commentary function underneath their articles to give the audience the possibility to publish their opinions (cf. www.hs.fi, www.usatoday.com, www.sueddeutsche.de). This is a global phenomenon, and the frequency of daily published comments seems to prove that the readers appreciate this new possibility of being interactive. The phenomenon has so far received only little attention of researchers, although it raises questions like: Why do the publishers allow their readers to comment news coverage? Why do the readers want to do that, and, in which way and to what extend do these posts influence what journalists think and write? Will we have to revise the traditional theoretical models of mass communication in future in order to recognise a stronger role of feedback? Mode of assessment: Assessment scale: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |