|
Verkkokeskustelua käsitteleviä artikkeleita
2002-2005
Listasin vuoden
2004 lopulla joukon verkossa käytävää keskustelua käsitteleviä artikkeleita .
Mukana on vain sellaisia tekstejä joiden täysversiot ovat saatavilla verkon kautta. Jotkut kuitenkin vain Helsingin yliopiston (osa muidenkin yliopistojen) palvelimien kautta hankittujen oikeuksien mukaisella tavalla. 3.1.2006 listalla on 68 artikkelia: vuodelta
2005 15 kpl, vuodelta 2004 29 kpl, vuodelta 2003 15 kpl ja vuodelta 2002 9
kpl.
Vuosittainen jakauma ei ole sattumanvarainen, vaan kuvaa
verkkokeskusteluja käsittelevien tutkimusartikkelien määrän voimakasta
kasvua viime vuosina. Samalla myös sisällöt ovat koko ajan muuttuneet
kiinnostavimmiksi ja haastavimmiksi. Analyysi kohdentuu yhä tarkemmin sekä keskustelun yksityiskohtiin että
yleisemmän mallinnuksen ongelmiin.
Pääosin artikkelit ovat TOP-10 listani lehdistä, mutta
joukossa on jonkin verran myös muista lehdistä poimittuja kirjoituksia. Mukana on vain
sellaisia artikkeleita, joiden täysversiot ovat saatavissa netin kautta pdf
tai html –muodossa, tosin valitettavasti useinkin vain yliopiston kirjaston e-lehdet palvelun
(ja yliopiston tiekoneiden) kautta.
Jos et pääse suoraan käsiksi artikkelien täysversioon kysy neuvoa: raimo.parikka@helsinki.fi
Katso myös
Verkkopedalehdet blogin uusia lehtiesittelyjä ja Elizabeth A. Murphy & co:n listaa (alla). Myös useimmat "Blogit
yliopisto-opetuksessa" osastossa olevat artikkelit käsittelevät tavalla
tai toisella verkkokeskusteluja.
Artikkelit ovat alla
ilmestymisensä mukaisessa järjestyksessä, tuoreimmat päällimmäisinä. Lista
ei ole kattava, mutta se on kuitenkin edustava otos koko ajan vilkkaammaksi
käyvästä verkkokeskusteluun kohdistuvasta tutkimuksesta.
Täydennän listaa
sitä mukaa kun uusia artikkeleita löytyy. Ehkä jossain vaiheessa olisi myös
toiveita niiden sisällöllisemmästä kommentoinnista tai laajemmasta
yhteenvedosta. Tarvetta sellaisella varmaankin olisi.
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
2005
Contrasting syntactic and semantic units in the analysis of online
discussions Elizabeth Murphy and Justyna Ciszewska-Carr,
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 21, Number 4, 2005
(ei vielä vapaasti saatavilla) lisätty 31.12.2005
Learning
through online discussion: A case of triangulation in research Michael
Hammond University of Warwick, UK, Mongkolchai Wiriyapinit,
Chulalongkorn University, Thailand Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology Volume 21, Number 3, 2005 lisätty 31.12.2005
This paper reports on issues in carrying out
research into online discussion. The context is a study of a distance
learning module within an MBA program. The module required students to
tackle problems based on real life scenarios within small online groups.
Students were studying part time and shared similar professional
backgrounds. The research looked at students' overall evaluation of the
module, ways in which group work was conducted, and the contribution of the
tutor. The approach taken was an interpretive case study using
questionnaire survey, text analysis and interviews. The main findings from
the study are reported, but the focus is on the strengths of, and
difficulties in, using the research methods. Triangulation of methods
provides the researcher with a greater degree of confidence in reporting
findings, although subjective interpretation is still needed.
Sources of Difference in Reliability: Identifying Sources of Difference in
Reliability in Content Analysis of Online Asynchronous Discussions
Elizabeth Murphy Memorial University of
Newfoundland Canada Justyna Ciszewska-Carr
Memorial University of Newfoundland Canada,
International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
(July - 2005)
lisätty 3.10.2005
Abstract:This paper reports on a case study
which identifies and illustrates sources of difference in agreement in
relation to reliability in a context of quantitative content analysis of a
transcript of an online asynchronous discussion (OAD). Transcripts of 10
students in a month-long online asynchronous discussion were coded by two
coders using an instrument with two categories, five processes, and 19
indicators of Problem Formulation and Resolution (PFR).
Online Writing as
an Indicator of Student Performance
Michael K. Barbour and Michael A.J. Collins
International Journal of Instructional Technologu & Distance Learning
Vol. 2. No. 8.
June 2005
lisätty 1.9.2005
Abstract: In this paper, the authors consider student use of a web-based
discussion forum in a second year, non-major Biology course. The authors
discuss how meaningful participation in the forum is a form of public
writing and may be an indicator of overall student success in the course.
The authors also discuss how this success in the course is not tied to the
students’ previous performance at the post-secondary level.
Students' self analysis of contributions to online asynchronous discussions
Elizabeth Murphy
Memorial University of Newfoundland & Jamie
Loveless,
Exploits Valley High -
Maple Division, Grand Falls-Windsor, NL,
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
2005, 21(2), 155-172.
This paper presents an example of an approach that involves both the
student and the instructor in the evaluation of an online discussion in a
context of teaching and learning. According to this approach, the student
conducts a self analysis of his or her contributions to the discussion,
using criteria supplied in advance of the discussion. One student's four
part self analysis of his contribution to an online discussion is presented
to illustrate the approach. The self analysis focused on the number and
length of postings, claims and grounds, and on knowledge construction, and
was designed to engage students in higher levels of thinking. The approach
to self analysis is discussed in terms of its modification for use in other
contexts and implications for practice are presented.
Critical Thinking
in Asynchronous Discussions, Greg Walker,
International Journal of Instructional Technologu & Distance Learning
Vol. 2. No. 6.
June 2005
Reading Between the Lines:
Understanding the role of latent content in the analysis of online
asynchronous discussions ,
Elizabeth Murphy and Maria A. Rodriguez
Manzanares,
International Journal of Instructional Technologu & Distance Learning
From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner
participation in asynchronous discussion, Dennen, Vanessa Paz,
Distance Education Volume 26 Number 1 May, 2005,
pp.
127-148(22)
Interaction and interpersonality in online discussion forums,
Beuchot, Alberto; Bullen, Mark,
Distance Education Volume 26 Number 1 May, 2005,
pp. 67-87(21)
The Ebb and Flow of Online Discussions:
What Bloom Can Tell Us About Our Students’ Conversations Katrina A.
Meyer The University of Memphis
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network,
9(1) - March 2005.
Abstract: This study looks at online
discussions within the context of a group endeavor and attempts to evaluate
three assertions: 1) students in an online discussion proceed through higher
levels of thinking; 2) Online conversations follow an “ebb and flow” pattern;
3) The level of the first posting to the discussion influences the level of
subsequent postings. Postings were classified by the Bloom’s taxonomy of
educational objectives and were graphed to help analyze the assertions.
Two Methods for Assessing Critical Thinking in Computer-Mediated
Communications (CMC) Transcripts, Patrick
J. Fahy, International Journal of
Instructional Technologu & Distance Learning
Vol. 2. No. 3. March 2005
A Content Analytic Comparison of Learning Processes in Online and
Face-to-Face Case Study Discussions
Robert
Heckman Syracuse University, School of
Information Studies and Hala Annabi
The Information School, University of Washington,
Journal of
Computer-Mediated-Communucation 10/2 March 2005
Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community
Norman Vaughan and D. Randy Garrison,
The Internet and Higher Education Volume
8, Issue 1, Pages 1-12 (1rd Quarter 2005)
The
Development of Socialization in an On-line Learning Environment
Norah Jones & Paul Peachey University of Glamorgan Journal of Interactive Online Learning, Volume 3, Number 3, Winter 2005.
Using data
mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums,
Laurie P. Dringus and Timothy Ellis,
Computers & Education, Volume 45, Issue 1,
Pages 141-160
2004
Gender and Online Discourse in the Principles of Economics, Duane B. Graddy, Middle Tennessee State University,
Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Network,
8(4) - December 2004.
Exploring the Interaction Equation: Validating a Rubric to Assess and
Encourage Interaction in Distance Courses M. D. Roblyer
University of Maryland University College &W. R. Wiencke University of West Georgia,
Journal
of Asynchronous Learning Network,
8(4) - December 2004.
Promoting
construct validity in instruments for the analysis of transcripts of online
asynchronous discussions. Murphy, Elizabeth A. Educational
Media International, 41(4),346-354.
An instrument
to support thinking critically about critical thinking in online
asynchronous discussions. Murphy, Elizabeth A.
Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology, 20(3),295-316.
Recognizing and
promoting collaboration in online asynchronous discussions,
Murphy, Elizabeth A.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421-431.
Perceptions of mediated presence in an
asynchronous online course: interplay of communication behaviors and medium Tracy Callaway Russo; Scott Campbell,
Distance Education Volume 25 Number 2 October 2004
When
Blogging Goes Bad: A Cautionary Tale About Blogs, Emailing
Lists, Discussion, and Interaction, Steven D. Krause,
Kairos 9.1 Fall 2004
Collaborative online learning: interaction patterns and limiting factors, Yvonne
Fung Open Learning
Volume 19 Number 2 June 2004
Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education,
Karen
Kear,
Open Learning
Volume 19 Number 2 June 2004
Benefits of An Online Discussion List
in A Traditional Distance Education Course Julie Bradshaw and Leone
Hinton , School of Nursing and Health Studies, Central Queensland University,
Rockhampton-Australia, Turkish Online Journal of Distance
Education-TOJDE July 2004 I
Volume:5 Number:3
Beyond an Institutionalized Learning
Environment: Fostering Interactions and Learning Using Synchronous and
Asynchronous Messaging Systems Ma. Luisa D. Mariano, Nikki Philline
C. De La Rosa, University of the Philippines Open University-Philippines, Turkish Online Journal of Distance
Education-TOJDE July 2004 I
Volume:5 Number:3
The WebCT Discussion List and How it
is Perceived Beth Tennent, Dr. Paul Hyland, Central Queensland
University Rockhampton-Australia, Turkish Online Journal of Distance
Education-TOJDE July 2004 I
Volume:5 Number:3
Interactive rhetoric for
online learning environments, Andrew Potter,
The Internet and Higher Education Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 169-262 (3rd
Quarter 2004)
A Peek into the Life of Online Learning
Discussion Forums: Implications for Web-Based Distance Learning,
Mary Allan,
University of Canterbury, New Zealand,
International Review
of Research in Open and Distance Learning Volume 5, Number 2
Integration of an Online Discussion Forum in a Campus-based
Undergraduate Biology Class
Sandrine Turcotte Thérèse Laferrière,
Canadian Journal of Learning and
Technology Volume 30(2) Spring / 2004
Interaction and Immediacy in Online Learning,
Robert
H. Woods, Spring Arbor University, USA &
Jason D. Baker,
Regent University, USA,
International Review
of Research in Open and Distance Learning
Volume 5, Number 2
Peer Teaching in Web Based
Threaded Discussions,
William F. Brescia, Jr.
James Swartz, Cathy Pearman, Richard Balkin and David Williams
University of Arkansas, Journal of Interactive Online learning,
Volume 3,
Number 2, Fall 2004
Influence of Personality on
Online Discussion,
Sue-Jen Chen University of North
Carolina at Wilmington and Edward J. Caropreso,
University of North Carolina, Wilmington,
Journal of Interactive Online learning, Volume 3,
Number 2, Fall 2004
Interaction in Learner-Paced Learning,
Terry Anderson, David Annand & Norine Wark,
October, 2004, CIDER,
Canadian Institute for Distance Education Research . (ei pelkästään
keskustelun erittelyä)
Supporting Asynchronous Discussions among Online
Learners, Joram Ngwenya, David Annand & Eric Wang, Theory and Practice of
Online Learning, Athabascan yliopiston verkkokirjan artikkeli.
Graduate Students’ Experiences of
Challenges in Online Asynchronous Discussions
Elizabeth Murphy & Elizabeth Coleman,
Canadian
Journal of Learning and Technology,
Volume
30, Issue 2 , Spring 2004.
Defining and
Measuring Quality in Online Discussions,
Alexandru Spatariu, Kendall Hatley and Lisa D. Bendixen, The Journal of
Interactive Online Learning, Volume 2
Number 4, Spring 2004
A constructivist method for the analysis of
networked cognitive communication and the assessment of collaborative
learning and knowledge-building. Campos,
2004 Campos, M. (2004).
Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Network,
8(2) - April 2004.
Evaluating Online Discussions: Four Different Frames of
Analysis ,
Dr. Katrina A. Meyer, Journal
of Asynchronous Learning Networks ,
Volume 8, Issue 2 - April 2004
Predicting Learning from Asynchronous Online Discussions
Dezhi Wu &
Starr Roxanne Hiltz ,Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Networks ,
Volume 8, Issue
2 - April 2004
Monitoring online communication: can the development of convergence and
social presence indicate an interactive learning environment? Lisa Lobry
de Bruyn
Distance Education
Volume 25 Number 1 May 2004
Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship
between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated
conferencing Deborah LaPointe; Charlotte Gunawardena,
Distance Education
Volume 25 Number 1 May 2004
Increasing Students'
Interactivity in an Online Course,
M Cecil Smith and Amy Winking-Diaz Northern Illinois University,
Journal of Interactive Online learning,
Volume 2,
Number 3, Winter 2004
Evaluating College
Students' Efforts in Asynchronous Discussion By: Knowlton, Dave S..
Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Spring2003, Vol. 4
Issue 1
2003
Disadvantages of Collaborative Online Discussion and the Advantages of
Sociability, Fun and Cliques for Online Learning Ted Clark, Proceedings
of the 3.1 and 3.3 working groups conference on International federation for
information processing: ICT and the teacher of the future, Melbourne,
Australia, pp. 23-25 (Saatavilla ACM Digital Library portaalin kautta)
Virtual discussion:
Understanding college students' electronic bulletin board use
Robert S. Weisskirch and Sharon Seidman
Milburn, The
Internet and Higher Education Volume 6, Issue
3, (3rd Quarter 2003)
The
influence of group size on nonmandatory asynchronous instructional
discussion groups Avner Caspi, Paul Gorsky
and Eran Chajut,
The Internet and Higher Education
Volume 6, Issue 3, (3rd Quarter 2003)
Conversations in Cyberspace:
a study of online learning, Elizabeth Browne,
Open Learning Volume 18 Number 3 September 2003
Investigating Triggers in CMC Text Transcripts
Krista R. Poscente
Masters of Distance Education Program, Athabasca University – Canada’s Open
University Patrick J. Fahy
Associate Professor, Centre for Distance Education, Athabasca University –
Canada’s Open University,
International Review
of Research in Open and Distance Learning (October - 2003)
Exploring
electronic forum participation and interaction by efl speakers in two
web-based graduate-level courses, Senem
Yildiz; Barbara A. Bichelmeyer,
Distance Education Volume 24 Number 2 October 2003
Asynchronous Discussion Groups in Teacher Training
Classes: Perceptions of Native and Non-Native Students, Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas,
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks ,
Volume 7, Issue
3 - September 2003
Face-To-Face Versus Threaded Discussions: The Role of
Time and Higher-Order Thinking
Dr. Katrina A. Meyer, Journal
of Asynchronous Learning Networks ,
Volume 7, Issue
3 - September 2003
Case Studies of Distance
Students' Perceptions of Participation and Interaction in Three Asynchronous
Web-based Conferencing Classes in The U.S.
Senem YILDIZ and Carrie CHANG, PhD
Candidates, Language Education Indiana University, Bloomington, USA,
Turkish Online Journal of Distance
Education-TOJDE April 2003 I
Volume:4 Number:2
The
Role of Online, Asynchronous Interaction in Development of Light and Color
Concepts
Kevin Carr, George Fox University, Francis Gardner, Columbus
State University,
Michael Odell, University of Idaho, Ted Munsch , Alaska
PacificUniversity, Brent Wilson, George Fox University,
Journal of Interactive Online learning,
Volume 2,
Number 2, Fall 2003
Social Constructivism and Asynchronous
Text-Based Discussion: A Case Study with Trainee Teachers,
Kate Hawkey
Education University of Bath,
Education and Information Technologies
(2): 165-177, June 2003
An Exploratory Study on the Use of Asynchronous Online Discussion in
Hypermedia Design,
Khe Foon Hew, Wing Sum Cheung, Nanyang
Technological University Singapore
E-JIST
E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology,
Vol 6 No 1.
Influence of Non-Moderated and Moderated Discussion Sites
on Student Success ,
Deborah A. Kashy , Guy Albertelli II, W.
Bauer, E. Kashy, M. Thoennessen ,
Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Networks, Volume 7, Issue 1
- February 2003
Asynchronous Discussion in Support of Medical Education
, Martin Oliver & Graham P. Shaw Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Networks, Volume 7, Issue
1 - February 2003
Gender Diffrences: Are they diminished in online discussions?, Gayle V.
Davidson-Shivers, Samatha B. Morris, & Tuangrat Sriwongkol , International
Journal of E-Learning Ja-Ma 2003.
2002
Using Electronic Communication Effectively in your Teaching, Shirley
Reushle, Lecturer, Flexible Learning Department of Further Education and
Training Faculty of Education The University of Southern Queensland.
"Opas".
Socialization in the "virtual
hallway": Instant messaging in the asynchronous Web-based distance education
classroom
Scott Nicholson,
The Internet
and Higher Education, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 293-409 (2002)
Written Interaction: A Key Component in Online Learning,
Judith C. Lapadat , Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,
Volume 7, Issue 4 (7,4)
Personalised knowledge representations: the missing half of online
discussions. By: Chen, Der–Thanq; Hung, David.
British
Journal of Educational Technology, Jun2002, Vol. 33 Issue 3.
Mechanisms of common ground in case-based
web discussions in teacher education
Kati Mäkitalo, Päivi Häkkinen, Piritta Leinonen and Sanna Järvelä,
The Internet and Higher Education Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 197-291 (Autumn
2002)
The Use
of Online Synchronous Discussion Groups to Enhance Community Formation and
Professional Identity Development Lee Duemer, Dean
Fontenot, Kathryn Gumfory, Mary Kallus, JoAnn Larsen, Susan Schafer, and
Benny C. Shaw, Jr.Texas Tech University ; Journal of Interactive
Online Learning
Volume 1, Number 2, Fall 2002
The
Use of Online Synchronous Discussion Groups to Enhance Community Formation
and Professional Identity Development,
Lee Duemer, Dean Fontenot, Kathryn
Gumfory, Mary Kallus, JoAnn Larsen, Susan Schafer, and Benny C. Shaw, Jr.
Texas Tech University,
Journal of Interactive Online learning, Volume 1,
Number 2, Fall 2002
Exploring Social Communication in Computer Conferencing,
Liam Rourke and Terry Anderson, University of Alberta, Canada, Journal of
Interactive Learning Research, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, 2002,
pp. 259-275.
Supporting Electronic Discourse: Principles of Design From a
Social Constructivist Perspective, Amy
Wu, University of Michigan, USA, Journal of Interactive
Learning Research, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, 2003, pp. 167-184.
Online Asynchronous Discussion in Teaching and
Learning: A Bibliography
Myös muualla osataan laatia tämänkaltaisia listoja ja vieläpä sangen
erinomaisia. Newfoundlandin Memorial yliopiston prof. Elizabeth A.
Murphyn johtama työryhmä on koonnut laajan bibliografian asynkronisen
verkkokeskustelun käytöstä opetuksessa ja oppimisessa (Online
Asynchronous Discussion in Teaching and Learning: A Bibliography).
Luettelon 6. versio on päivätty huhtikuussa 2005 ja sitä ilmeisesti
päivitetään puolivuosittain. Luettelo on jaettu
seuraaviin osa-alueisiin:
- Content Analysis
- Moderating/Facilitating/Structuring
- Communities
- Collaboration/Interaction
- Online Discussion Quality Improvement
- Problem Formulation and Resolution
- Critical Thinking
- Participation
- Case Studies
- Professional Practice
- Evaluating/Grading
- General
Luettelo kattaa ajallisesti viimeiset 15
vuotta. Se ei kuitenkaan ole viime vuosien osalta yhtä laaja kuin omani. |